Differentially Private Synthetic Data from Sliced Chebyshev Moments
Abstract
Research on practical differentially private (DP) synthetic data has largely focused on methods that approximately preserve low-dimensional marginals of a target distribution, and can thus only hope to preserve higher-dimensional, global structure as a lucky by-product. At the same time, existing methods that target global accuracy guarantees pay a price exponential in the data dimension, $d$. In this work, we address this curse of dimensionality'' by presenting a new DP synthetic data algorit...
Description / Details
Research on practical differentially private (DP) synthetic data has largely focused on methods that approximately preserve low-dimensional marginals of a target distribution, and can thus only hope to preserve higher-dimensional, global structure as a lucky by-product. At the same time, existing methods that target global accuracy guarantees pay a price exponential in the data dimension, . In this work, we address this ``curse of dimensionality'' by presenting a new DP synthetic data algorithm, SPLICE, that comes with a compelling global distributional guarantee, even in high-dimensions, and moreover, is practically state-of-the-art. Our algorithm is based on measuring noisy sliced Chebyshev polynomial moments of the target distribution and fitting a distribution to match, a twist on recent polynomial methods for 1-D synthetic data. We prove that, given a dataset of examples, SPLICE returns a private distribution with Sliced Wasserstein-1 distance from the target, for constant privacy parameters. Notably, this bound is independent of the data dimension, . Along the way, we prove a moment matching result of independent interest: for a distribution on the unit ball, matching the first Chebyshev moments along random directions guarantees Sliced Wasserstein error. Finally, we provide a practical implementation of the algorithm that borrows tools from the tensor decomposition literature and achieves state-of-the-art performance compared to prior DP synthetic data methods on an extensive benchmark.
Source: arXiv:2610.42081v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.42081v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.42081v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.42081v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Nov 3, 2026
Data Science
Machine Learning
0