Entanglement diagnostics of stochastic-resetting steady states: theory and measurement on superconducting qubits
Abstract
Stochastic resetting drives quantum systems into nonequilibrium stationary states unreachable under uninterrupted unitary evolution, and their entanglement depends on whether the reset history is resolved or averaged over. We study this interplay in the transverse-field Ising chain, deriving closed-form results for two qubits and evaluating chains of up to 12 qubits exactly. In the two-qubit system, these closed-form results show that phase matching between energy eigenstates produces resonances...
Description / Details
Stochastic resetting drives quantum systems into nonequilibrium stationary states unreachable under uninterrupted unitary evolution, and their entanglement depends on whether the reset history is resolved or averaged over. We study this interplay in the transverse-field Ising chain, deriving closed-form results for two qubits and evaluating chains of up to 12 qubits exactly. In the two-qubit system, these closed-form results show that phase matching between energy eigenstates produces resonances, and their visibility in the stationary state is determined by the symmetry of the reset state. Measurements on an IBM superconducting processor show the entropies evaluated before and after the reset average closely following noiseless predictions with no fitted parameter, while concurrence lies below prediction across most of the hardware measurements. The two diagnostics respond differently because they read different components of the same reconstructed state, and a depolarizing model captures the concurrence suppression with one fitted parameter. The difference between the two entropies, i. e., the Jensen gap of entanglement entropy, equals the Holevo information that a subsystem retains about the time since the last reset. With a Bell-state reset, this information grows with chain length across a half-chain cut over the sizes studied, without visible saturation at the smaller reset probabilities. Since reset times are sampled and recorded classically, the trajectory-averaged entropy, and with it the Jensen gap, is obtained without postselection, in contrast to monitored circuits, where trajectory-resolved entanglement requires sampling exponentially rare measurement records.
Source: arXiv:2610.40638v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40638v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.40638v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40638v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Oct 30, 2026
Quantum Computing
Quantum Physics
0