Improved Gradient Complexity for Quasi-Newton Proximal Extragradient Methods via Certified Curvature Reuse
Abstract
We study how curvature estimated from gradient differences can accelerate proximal-extragradient quasi-Newton methods. Existing global guarantees for QNPE, A-QNPE, and OL-OQN learn Hessian approximations online and incur dimension dependence through regret bounds. We introduce certified curvature reuse: one finite-difference probe per iteration refreshes a group of Hessian columns, while a path-length certificate controls the error of stale columns and determines the step. Each iteration uses at...
Description / Details
We study how curvature estimated from gradient differences can accelerate proximal-extragradient quasi-Newton methods. Existing global guarantees for QNPE, A-QNPE, and OL-OQN learn Hessian approximations online and incur dimension dependence through regret bounds. We introduce certified curvature reuse: one finite-difference probe per iteration refreshes a group of Hessian columns, while a path-length certificate controls the error of stale columns and determines the step. Each iteration uses at most three gradient queries and one regularized linear solve (or trust-region step), without a gradient line search or an inner oracle-querying loop. In the convex and strongly convex settings, bisection on stored scalar quantities selects a near-maximal certified stepsize; in the nonconvex setting, a uniform certificate gives an explicit learning rate. With other problem parameters fixed, the convex method attains in a single run, with no logarithmic factor or additive dimension term, matching accelerated gradient descent (AGD) for and improving on A-QNPE thereafter. In the strongly convex setting with condition number , a single run matches AGD's rate for and achieves a superlinear upper envelope, eventually scaling as with , improving on QNPE. In the nonconvex setting, the method finds an -stationary point in gradient queries, improving on OL-OQN's . For sparse Hessians, is replaced by an effective dimension . We also compare our bounds with lazy-Hessian, double-loop, and cutting-plane methods.
Source: arXiv:2610.40608v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40608v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.40608v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40608v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Oct 30, 2026
Mathematics
Mathematics
0