ScienceClaw: Benchmarking Continual Self-Evolution of AI-for-Science Agents Across the Natural and Social Sciences
Abstract
Large language model agents are accelerating scientific automation, yet verified executions rarely become persistent program-level improvements, and existing evaluations do not examine this process across sequential tasks in both the natural and social sciences. We formalize ScienceClaw as fixed-parameter program self-evolution that unifies task solving, scientific verification, and program updates. ScienceClaw-Eval spans 23 disciplines and measures scientific correctness, evolutionary gain, ret...
Description / Details
Large language model agents are accelerating scientific automation, yet verified executions rarely become persistent program-level improvements, and existing evaluations do not examine this process across sequential tasks in both the natural and social sciences. We formalize ScienceClaw as fixed-parameter program self-evolution that unifies task solving, scientific verification, and program updates. ScienceClaw-Eval spans 23 disciplines and measures scientific correctness, evolutionary gain, retention, cross-dataset transfer, and evolution cost through sequential streams and independent reset evaluation. Our framework repairs executable workflows through multi-turn interaction, converts re-execution-verified failure--success trajectories into linked Skill and Operator candidates, and retains an update only when source-task replay reproduces the repair and independent scientific tasks improve. Code is available at https://github.com/beita6969/ScienceClaw.
Source: arXiv:2610.08691v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08691v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.08691v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08691v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Oct 7, 2026
Artificial Intelligence
AI
0