Artificial Aesthetics: The Implicit Economics of Valuing AI-Generated Text
Abstract
Aesthetic qualities command measurable premiums in traditional goods markets. However, it remains unclear whether users are willing to pay for such qualities in AI-generated text. This paper estimates the willingness to pay for aesthetic attributes in large language model outputs using an online experiment with N = 117 participants. Participants evaluated responses from four anonymized models across academic, professional, and personal contexts, rated outputs along multiple dimensions, and submi...
Description / Details
Aesthetic qualities command measurable premiums in traditional goods markets. However, it remains unclear whether users are willing to pay for such qualities in AI-generated text. This paper estimates the willingness to pay for aesthetic attributes in large language model outputs using an online experiment with N = 117 participants. Participants evaluated responses from four anonymized models across academic, professional, and personal contexts, rated outputs along multiple dimensions, and submitted bids for access using a Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) mechanism. We find no statistically significant relationship between perceived aesthetic quality and willingness to pay. While participants systematically distinguish between outputs and exhibit consistent preferences over stylistic features, these differences do not translate into higher monetary valuation. Further analysis shows that aesthetic and functional attributes load onto a single latent factor, suggesting that users perceive quality as a unified construct rather than a separable aesthetic dimension. These results imply that, in current large language model (LLM) markets, aesthetic improvements function as baseline expectations rather than sources of price differentiation.
Source: arXiv:2605.05578v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05578v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.05578v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05578v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
May 10, 2026
Environmental Science
Economics
0