En Route to a Standard QMA1 vs. QCMA Oracle Separation
Abstract
We study the power of quantum witnesses under perfect completeness. We construct a classical oracle relative to which a language lies in $\mathsf{QMA}_1$ but not in $\mathsf{QCMA}$ when the $\mathsf{QCMA}$ verifier is only allowed polynomially many adaptive rounds and exponentially many parallel queries per round. Additionally, we derandomize the permutation-oracle separation of Fefferman and Kimmel, obtaining an in-place oracle separation between $\mathsf{QMA}_1$ and $\mathsf{QCMA}$. Furthermor...
Description / Details
We study the power of quantum witnesses under perfect completeness. We construct a classical oracle relative to which a language lies in but not in when the verifier is only allowed polynomially many adaptive rounds and exponentially many parallel queries per round. Additionally, we derandomize the permutation-oracle separation of Fefferman and Kimmel, obtaining an in-place oracle separation between and . Furthermore, we focus on and with an exponentially small gap, where we show a separation assuming the gap is fixed, but not when it may be arbitrarily small. Finally, we derive consequences for approximate ground-state preparation from sparse Hamiltonian oracle access, including a bounded-adaptivity frustration-free variant.
Source: arXiv:2604.26921v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26921v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.26921v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26921v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Apr 30, 2026
Quantum Computing
Quantum Physics
0