Explorerโ€บQuantum Computingโ€บQuantum Physics
Research PaperResearchia:202604.30066

En Route to a Standard QMA1 vs. QCMA Oracle Separation

David Miloschewsky

Abstract

We study the power of quantum witnesses under perfect completeness. We construct a classical oracle relative to which a language lies in $\mathsf{QMA}_1$ but not in $\mathsf{QCMA}$ when the $\mathsf{QCMA}$ verifier is only allowed polynomially many adaptive rounds and exponentially many parallel queries per round. Additionally, we derandomize the permutation-oracle separation of Fefferman and Kimmel, obtaining an in-place oracle separation between $\mathsf{QMA}_1$ and $\mathsf{QCMA}$. Furthermor...

Submitted: April 30, 2026Subjects: Quantum Physics; Quantum Computing

Description / Details

We study the power of quantum witnesses under perfect completeness. We construct a classical oracle relative to which a language lies in QMA1\mathsf{QMA}_1 but not in QCMA\mathsf{QCMA} when the QCMA\mathsf{QCMA} verifier is only allowed polynomially many adaptive rounds and exponentially many parallel queries per round. Additionally, we derandomize the permutation-oracle separation of Fefferman and Kimmel, obtaining an in-place oracle separation between QMA1\mathsf{QMA}_1 and QCMA\mathsf{QCMA}. Furthermore, we focus on QCMA\mathsf{QCMA} and QMA\mathsf{QMA} with an exponentially small gap, where we show a separation assuming the gap is fixed, but not when it may be arbitrarily small. Finally, we derive consequences for approximate ground-state preparation from sparse Hamiltonian oracle access, including a bounded-adaptivity frustration-free variant.


Source: arXiv:2604.26921v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26921v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.26921v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26921v1

Please sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Access Paper
View Source PDF
Submission Info
Date:
Apr 30, 2026
Topic:
Quantum Computing
Area:
Quantum Physics
Comments:
0
Bookmark