Robustness, Cost, and Attack-Surface Concentration in Phishing Detection

Phishing detectors built on engineered website features attain near-perfect accuracy under i.i.d.\ evaluation, yet deployment security depends on robustness to post-deployment feature manipulation. We study this gap through a cost-aware evasion framework that models discrete, monotone feature edits under explicit attacker budgets. Three diagnostics are introduced: minimal evasion cost (MEC), the evasion survival rate $S(B)$, and the robustness concentration index (RCI). On the UCI Phishing Websites benchmark (11,055 instances, 30 ternary features), Logistic Regression, Random Forests, Gradient Boosted Trees, and XGBoost all achieve $\mathrm{AUC}\ge 0.979$ under static evaluation. Under budgeted sanitization-style evasion, robustness converges across architectures: the median MEC equals 2 with full features, and over 80% of successful minimal-cost evasions concentrate on three low-cost surface features. Feature restriction improves robustness only when it removes all dominant low-cost transitions. Under strict cost schedules, infrastructure-leaning feature sets exhibit 17-19% infeasible mass for ensemble models, while the median MEC among evadable instances remains unchanged. We formalize this convergence: if a positive fraction of correctly detected phishing instances admit evasion through a single feature transition of minimal cost $c_{\min}$, no classifier can raise the corresponding MEC quantile above $c_{\min}$ without modifying the feature representation or cost model. Adversarial robustness in phishing detection is governed by feature economics rather than model complexity.

Source: arXiv:2603.19204v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19204v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.19204v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19204v1