Taking Advantage of Noise in Distributed Random Quantum Circuits
Abstract
Adding noise can make a random quantum circuit look faster without making its unitary dynamics more random. This distinction is especially relevant in modular processors, where local gates randomize each core and scarce inter-core communication must spread that randomness across the full device. In this paper, we study this problem with a reduced second-moment transfer-matrix theory for Pauli second moments in distributed random circuits affected by the amplitude-damping, depolarizing, and depha...
Description / Details
Adding noise can make a random quantum circuit look faster without making its unitary dynamics more random. This distinction is especially relevant in modular processors, where local gates randomize each core and scarce inter-core communication must spread that randomness across the full device. In this paper, we study this problem with a reduced second-moment transfer-matrix theory for Pauli second moments in distributed random circuits affected by the amplitude-damping, depolarizing, and dephasing noise channels. The key step is to resolve the noisy spectrum into two branches: a radial branch, describing dissipative loss of non-identity Pauli weight, and an angular branch, describing Haar-like mixing within the surviving nontrivial sector. This separation gives a simple weak-noise criterion: noise is useful for angular randomization only when it suppresses the longitudinal Bloch component more strongly than the transverse plane. Among the three channels considered, this selects amplitude damping as the only locally favorable case, while depolarizing noise is neutral and dephasing is dominated by radial loss. For multicore architectures, we derive a universal first-order law for radial leakage and track the angular branch numerically across different channels, topologies, and core partitions. The results reveal narrow windows of genuine noise-assisted Haar mixing, most clearly for amplitude damping, but rule out a generic speed-up by noise. The framework therefore distinguishes useful noisy randomization from mere dissipation.
Source: arXiv:2609.11898v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11898v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.11898v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11898v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Sep 11, 2026
Quantum Computing
Quantum Physics
0