ExplorerComputer ScienceCybersecurity
Research PaperResearchia:202608.26015

Research Methodologies for Cybersecurity in Enterprise Environments: A Narrative Review, Synthesis and Executable Guide

Tran Duc Le

Abstract

Enterprise cybersecurity research draws on a wider range of methods than any single community routinely teaches. Researchers face a selection problem before they face a technical one: a study may simultaneously need a systematic review, a design-science artifact, a controlled detection experiment, an interview study, or an attack-graph model. This paper addresses that problem in two ways. First, it provides a narrative review and synthesis of methodological practices across a verified corpus of ...

Submitted: August 26, 2026Subjects: Cybersecurity; Computer Science

Description / Details

Enterprise cybersecurity research draws on a wider range of methods than any single community routinely teaches. Researchers face a selection problem before they face a technical one: a study may simultaneously need a systematic review, a design-science artifact, a controlled detection experiment, an interview study, or an attack-graph model. This paper addresses that problem in two ways. First, it provides a narrative review and synthesis of methodological practices across a verified corpus of 151 works. We organise these practices into eleven methodology families, detailing for each what questions it answers, the strength of its supporting evidence, and its common failure modes. Second, we convert each family into an executable protocol comprising ordered steps, required instruments, evaluation criteria, common validity threats, and a reporting checklist. Every protocol is also visually mapped to make the sequence, decisions, and threats legible at a glance. We also treat contradictions in the literature as evidence. For example, reported rankings of intrusion-detection algorithms are wildly inconsistent across individually careful studies. We argue this pattern is most parsimoniously explained by variations in evaluation design rather than the algorithms themselves, as these studies differ in design dimensions known to shift results by more than the margins separating the algorithms. Ultimately, the evidence supports methodological pluralism disciplined by explicit validity reasoning. We conclude that researchers must match their evaluation design to the decision under study, triangulate technical against organisational evidence, explicitly state the population a result generalises to, and report the conditions under which the result would not hold.


Source: arXiv:2608.24850v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.24850v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.24850v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.24850v1

Please sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Access Paper
View Source PDF
Submission Info
Date:
Aug 26, 2026
Topic:
Computer Science
Area:
Cybersecurity
Comments:
0
Bookmark
Research Methodologies for Cybersecurity in Enterprise Environments: A Narrative Review, Synthesis and Executable Guide | Researchia