Beyond minimal coupling for charged scalars? Modified electrodynamics and London-penetration tests

While standard minimal coupling works well for Dirac fermions, its application to scalar fields features a known peculiarity'': the term linear in $A_μ$ does not coincide with the conserved Noether current of the interacting theory. We recently proposed choosing a different principle for electromagnetic interactions, namely a linear coupling $A_μJ^μ$ with $J^μ$ a (globally) conserved current, accepting the consequence that one must abandon full local gauge invariance in the electromagnetic sector and adopt an extended electrodynamics (of Aharonov--Bohm type) that can couple consistently to non-locally-conserved currents. We present the physical motivations offered for proposing the modified coupling and discuss general consequences of reducing gauge invariance. We then focus on the central condensed-matter claim: for bosonic charged condensates, the modified framework predicts a rescaled magnetic penetration depth $λ\to λ/\sqrt{2}$, while leaving other key qualitative features of superconducting electrodynamics and the type-I/type-II distinction unchanged (up to an equivalent rescaling of the GL parameter). Finally, we analyze experimental data for a London-length consistency check based on independent measurements of the ratio $n_s/m^\ast$ between carrier density and effective mass. We compare for five materials an optical'' penetration depth $λ_{\mathrm{opt}}$ inferred from IR/THz superfluid spectral weight with a ``magnetic'' depth $λ_{\mathrm{mag}}$ obtained independently (LE-$μ$SR, TF-$μ$SR, microwave methods, etc.). Data for Nb, YBCO and Ba(Fe,Co)$_2$As$_2$ confirm the hypothesis $λ_{\mathrm{opt}}>λ_{\mathrm{mag}}$, with a ratio not far from 1.4; data for Pb are inconclusive while data for MgB$_2$ indicate $λ_{\mathrm{opt}}\simeqλ_{\mathrm{mag}}$ as predicted by the standard theory.

Source: arXiv:2605.20499v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20499v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.20499v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20499v1