A q-Tsallis Safe Approximation for Chance-Constrained Programs
Abstract
Classical chance-constrained programs are solved by safe approximations based on the empirical CVaR, which uses a uniform measure over scenarios and systematically underweights tail events under heavy-tailed distributions. We introduce \emph{q-CCP}, a non-extensive safe approximation grounded in the Riemannian geometry of the Tsallis statistical manifold: the rank-based q-CVaR escort weights are the $g^{(q)}$-geodesic projection onto the tail simplex face, and the q-CCP feasible set is a Tsallis...
Description / Details
Classical chance-constrained programs are solved by safe approximations based on the empirical CVaR, which uses a uniform measure over scenarios and systematically underweights tail events under heavy-tailed distributions. We introduce \emph{q-CCP}, a non-extensive safe approximation grounded in the Riemannian geometry of the Tsallis statistical manifold: the rank-based q-CVaR escort weights are the -geodesic projection onto the tail simplex face, and the q-CCP feasible set is a Tsallis-divergence ball (Proposition12). This geometric foundation yields three results. First, q-CCP is a provable strict tightening of CVaR-CCP for all (Theorem7). Second, the empirical violation ratio satisfies , independent of the tail index (Proposition10). Third, the feasible-region volume cost is monotone increasing in and (Proposition11), providing a data-adaptive safety knob. The formulation inherits convexity and coherence from the q-CVaR functional and admits an iterative LP reformulation converging in 2--3 iterations. Experiments on 15 Ibovespa equities confirm the theory (violation ratio , ); an M5 inventory newsvendor experiment generalises the method to supply chain (, cost premium , zero OOS stockout violations).
Source: arXiv:2606.06401v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06401v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.06401v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06401v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Jun 5, 2026
Mathematics
Mathematics
0