Three new exoplanet systems from the Dispersed Matter Planet Project
Abstract
We present a radial velocity analysis of three bright, low-activity stars identified by the Dispersed Matter Planet Project (DMPP). We use a Bayesian framework to compare purely Keplerian models with models incorporating stellar activity via a quasi-periodic Gaussian Process (GP). DMPP-7 (HD 118006) is a slightly evolved star that harbours a single 0.72 Saturn-mass giant ($m_\textrm{p}\sin i$ = 69 M$_\oplus$) with an orbital period of P = 4.93 d. A longer 21 d - 22 d period cannot be conclusivel...
Description / Details
We present a radial velocity analysis of three bright, low-activity stars identified by the Dispersed Matter Planet Project (DMPP). We use a Bayesian framework to compare purely Keplerian models with models incorporating stellar activity via a quasi-periodic Gaussian Process (GP). DMPP-7 (HD 118006) is a slightly evolved star that harbours a single 0.72 Saturn-mass giant ( = 69 M) with an orbital period of P = 4.93 d. A longer 21 d - 22 d period cannot be conclusively confirmed as a stellar rotation signature rather than a purely Keplerian signal. For HD 67200, which exhibits Ca ii H&K variability, a model with only a GP is strongly favoured over a purely dynamical model. The GP model shows moderate evidence for a single Keplerian with P = 2.67 d. For HD 2134, a 21 d - 32 d rotation period signal is associated with tentative FWHM variability. A model with a GP is not conclusively favoured, but all models considered show moderate evidence for an additional single Keplerian with P = 2.78 d. Despite our target selection favouring near edge-on orbital geometries, we find no evidence for transits in TESS photometry. DMPP-7 b lies at the transition between the high-radius population and the Neptunian ridge and savannah regions. Further observations are required to establish whether the coherent short-period HD 67200 and HD 2134 signals are stellar or dynamical in origin. If planetary, the signals correspond to minimum masses of = 2.07 M and = 2.86 M
Source: arXiv:2608.11902v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11902v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.11902v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11902v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Aug 13, 2026
Space Science
Astrophysics
0