Explorerโ€บComputer Visionโ€บComputer Vision
Research PaperResearchia:202609.09008

Studying Image Tokenizers as Visual Languages in Unified Multimodal Models

Siting Li

Abstract

Image tokenizers define the visual language'' of unified multimodal models, yet are commonly studied through isolated metrics or generation-/understanding-only evaluations. These evaluations do not fully capture how visual tokens behave when modeled jointly with text. We build a controlled pure-autoregressive testbed and track task-specific validation losses during multimodal continual pretraining across text, image, text-to-image (T2I), and image-to-text (I2T) prediction. We examine how these l...

Submitted: September 9, 2026Subjects: Computer Vision; Computer Vision

Description / Details

Image tokenizers define the ``visual language'' of unified multimodal models, yet are commonly studied through isolated metrics or generation-/understanding-only evaluations. These evaluations do not fully capture how visual tokens behave when modeled jointly with text. We build a controlled pure-autoregressive testbed and track task-specific validation losses during multimodal continual pretraining across text, image, text-to-image (T2I), and image-to-text (I2T) prediction. We examine how these losses scale and relate to downstream performance, then use them to study multimodal learnability---how well image and text tokens are jointly modeled---and tokenizer design. We find that (1) losses should be analyzed by task, since they exhibit distinct scaling behavior and rank tokenizers differently. (2) The loss--performance relationship depends on the predicted token space: for a fixed tokenizer, T2I and I2T losses correlate with generation quality, but across tokenizers, the T2I loss--performance relationship shifts with the image-token space, whereas I2T loss, computed over a shared text vocabulary, provides a more consistent signal. I2T loss also correlates with both generation and visual understanding performance after supervised finetuning. Using losses as a lens, we show that (3) better reconstruction does not necessarily yield lower task-specific losses or stronger downstream performance, and that (4) image tokenizer choice can affect text modeling under joint optimization. As case studies, we revisit three tokenizer design axes---the discriminator, semantic supervision, and vocabulary size---to examine their effects on joint modeling and downstream performance. Together, our testbed offers a complementary perspective on image tokenizers as visual languages, highlighting their interplay with text in joint multimodal training.


Source: arXiv:2609.09143v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09143v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.09143v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09143v1

Please sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Access Paper
View Source PDF
Submission Info
Date:
Sep 9, 2026
Topic:
Computer Vision
Area:
Computer Vision
Comments:
0
Bookmark
Studying Image Tokenizers as Visual Languages in Unified Multimodal Models | Researchia