Back to Explorer
Research PaperResearchia:202601.29104[Cryptography > Cybersecurity]

FIT: Defying Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual LLM Unlearning

Xiaoyu Xu

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities across diverse tasks but raise concerns about privacy, copyright, and harmful materials. Existing LLM unlearning methods rarely consider the continual and high-volume nature of real-world deletion requests, which can cause utility degradation and catastrophic forgetting as requests accumulate. To address this challenge, we introduce \fit, a framework for continual unlearning that handles large numbers of deletion requests while maintaining robustness against both catastrophic forgetting and post-unlearning recovery. \fit mitigates degradation through rigorous data \underline{F}iltering, \underline{I}mportance-aware updates, and \underline{T}argeted layer attribution, enabling stable performance across long sequences of unlearning operations and achieving a favorable balance between forgetting effectiveness and utility retention. To support realistic evaluation, we present \textbf{PCH}, a benchmark covering \textbf{P}ersonal information, \textbf{C}opyright, and \textbf{H}armful content in sequential deletion scenarios, along with two symmetric metrics, Forget Degree (F.D.) and Retain Utility (R.U.), which jointly assess forgetting quality and utility preservation. Extensive experiments on four open-source LLMs with hundreds of deletion requests show that \fit achieves the strongest trade-off between F.D. and R.U., surpasses existing methods on MMLU, CommonsenseQA, and GSM8K, and remains resistant against both relearning and quantization recovery attacks.


Source: arXiv:2601.21682v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21682v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.21682v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21682v1

Submission:1/29/2026
Comments:0 comments
Subjects:Cybersecurity; Cryptography
Original Source:
View Original PDF
arXiv: This paper is hosted on arXiv, an open-access repository
Was this helpful?

Discussion (0)

Please sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!