Exponential Convex Calibration Dimension for the Multi-Label Jaccard Measure
Abstract
The per-instance Jaccard score, or intersection over union (IoU), is standard in multi-label classification and binary segmentation. With $s$ labels, its loss matrix has $2^s$ outcomes and reports. Under the convention $\mathrm{Jac}(\varnothing,\varnothing)=1$, we prove that the Jaccard score, shifted-loss, and ordinary loss matrices are nonsingular and that the loss columns have affine dimension $2^s-1$. The proof combines a finite MinHash Gram representation with Boolean Möbius inversion. For ...
Description / Details
The per-instance Jaccard score, or intersection over union (IoU), is standard in multi-label classification and binary segmentation. With labels, its loss matrix has outcomes and reports. Under the convention , we prove that the Jaccard score, shifted-loss, and ordinary loss matrices are nonsingular and that the loss columns have affine dimension . The proof combines a finite MinHash Gram representation with Boolean Möbius inversion. For exact calibration, we prove . The lower bound uses a factorially weighted distribution with supported outcomes and Bayes-optimal reports. Consequently, every exactly calibrated convex surrogate requires exponentially many prediction coordinates. We also give two polynomial-dimensional approximation guarantees with explicit regret transfers. A new -to-Jaccard transfer turns an existing -dimensional surrogate into a polynomial-time rule with asymptotic Jaccard regret at most . For any and , a MinHash square-loss surrogate attains Jaccard-regret floor uniformly over arbitrary conditional label distributions. With probability at least , the direct construction has dimension , while a signed variant has dimension . Thus zero-regret calibration requires exponential dimension, whereas every fixed additive regret tolerance admits polynomial prediction dimension.
Source: arXiv:2608.13549v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13549v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.13549v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13549v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Aug 14, 2026
Data Science
Machine Learning
0