ExplorerBiomedical EngineeringEngineering
Research PaperResearchia:202602.13029

Training-Free Stimulus Encoding for Retinal Implants via Sparse Projected Gradient Descent

Henning Konermann

Abstract

Retinal implants aim to restore functional vision despite photoreceptor degeneration, yet are fundamentally constrained by low resolution electrode arrays and patient-specific perceptual distortions. Most deployed encoders rely on task-agnostic downsampling and linear brightness-to-amplitude mappings, which are suboptimal under realistic perceptual models. While global inverse problems have been formulated as neural networks, such approaches can be fast at inference, and can achieve high reconst...

Submitted: February 13, 2026Subjects: Engineering; Biomedical Engineering

Description / Details

Retinal implants aim to restore functional vision despite photoreceptor degeneration, yet are fundamentally constrained by low resolution electrode arrays and patient-specific perceptual distortions. Most deployed encoders rely on task-agnostic downsampling and linear brightness-to-amplitude mappings, which are suboptimal under realistic perceptual models. While global inverse problems have been formulated as neural networks, such approaches can be fast at inference, and can achieve high reconstruction fidelity, but require training and have limited generalizability to arbitrary inputs. We cast stimulus encoding as a constrained sparse least-squares problem under a linearized perceptual forward model. Our key observation is that the resulting perception matrix can be highly sparse, depending on patient and implant configuration. Building on this, we apply an efficient projected residual norm steepest descent solver that exploits sparsity and supports stimulus bounds via projection. In silico experiments across four simulated patients and implant resolutions from 15×1515\times15 to 100×100100\times100 electrodes demonstrate improved reconstruction fidelity, with up to +0.265+0.265 SSIM increase, +12.4dB+12.4\,\mathrm{dB} PSNR, and 81.4%81.4\% MAE reduction on Fashion-MNIST compared to Lanczos downsampling.


Source: arXiv:2602.10906v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10906v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.10906v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10906v1

Please sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Access Paper
View Source PDF
Submission Info
Date:
Feb 13, 2026
Topic:
Biomedical Engineering
Area:
Engineering
Comments:
0
Bookmark