Explorerโ€บData Scienceโ€บMachine Learning
Research PaperResearchia:202607.03075

Optimal Stabilizer Testing and Learning with Limited Quantum Memory

Srinivasan Arunachalam

Abstract

We study stabilizer state testing and learning with limited coherent quantum memory. Here an algorithm sequentially receives copies of an unknown $n$-qubit state, but may keep only $k$ qubits of coherent quantum memory between measurements. With unrestricted memory, seminal work of Gross, Nezami and Walter showed how to test $n$-qubit stabilizer states using $6$ copies, which is dimension independent, unlike the learning complexity of $ฮ˜(n)$. We show that this testing-vs-learning separation is l...

Submitted: July 3, 2026Subjects: Machine Learning; Data Science

Description / Details

We study stabilizer state testing and learning with limited coherent quantum memory. Here an algorithm sequentially receives copies of an unknown nn-qubit state, but may keep only kk qubits of coherent quantum memory between measurements. With unrestricted memory, seminal work of Gross, Nezami and Walter showed how to test nn-qubit stabilizer states using 66 copies, which is dimension independent, unlike the learning complexity of ฮ˜(n)ฮ˜(n). We show that this testing-vs-learning separation is lost under memory constraints. More concretely we show that (1) The sample complexity of testing stabilizer states in the kk-qubit memory framework is ฮ˜(nโˆ’k)ฮ˜(n-k). Our upper bound goes via a novel connection to the hidden shift problem and the lower bound is proven using a novel approach to average case bounds on likelihood ratios via combinatorics of the stochastic orthogonal group. (2) The sample complexity of learning stabilizer states with kk qubits of memory, in the non-adaptive framework, is ฮ˜(n2/k)ฮ˜(n^2/k). As a further application of our techniques, we prove an exponential lower bound for purity testing even when the memory may be left coherent throughout the protocol. Our main results identify coherent quantum memory as the resource enabling the usual separation between stabilizer testing and learning. In particular, even with k=0.99nk=0.99n qubits of memory, there is no constant-copy stabilizer tester; furthermore for k=cnk=cn qubits of memory (for 0<c<10< c < 1), stabilizer testing is as hard as learning, with both requiring ฮ˜(n)ฮ˜(n) copies.


Source: arXiv:2607.02444v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02444v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.02444v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02444v1

Please sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Access Paper
View Source PDF
Submission Info
Date:
Jul 3, 2026
Topic:
Data Science
Area:
Machine Learning
Comments:
0
Bookmark