The Condition-Number Barrier in Sparse Least Squares
Abstract
In [AS21], Axiotis and Sviridenko conjectured that the linear dependence on the restricted condition number in sparse convex optimization cannot be improved by a polynomial-time algorithm. We establish their conjectured lower bound for least-squares objectives, conditional on the randomized exact-volume Small-Set Expansion Hypothesis in the weighted regular-graph formulation of Raghavendra, Steurer, and Tulsiani [RST12]. Concretely, for every fixed $γ\in(0,1]$, there is no randomized polynomial-...
Description / Details
In [AS21], Axiotis and Sviridenko conjectured that the linear dependence on the restricted condition number in sparse convex optimization cannot be improved by a polynomial-time algorithm. We establish their conjectured lower bound for least-squares objectives, conditional on the randomized exact-volume Small-Set Expansion Hypothesis in the weighted regular-graph formulation of Raghavendra, Steurer, and Tulsiani [RST12]. Concretely, for every fixed , there is no randomized polynomial-time algorithm that, with probability at least , returns a vector such that, writing , [ \lVert Ax-b\rVert_2^2 \leq \min_{\lVert z\rVert_0\leq k}\lVert Az-b\rVert_2^2+\varepsilon \quad\text{and}\quad s=O!\left(k,κ_{s+k}^{,1-γ}\right), ] where is the restricted condition number at sparsity level . The result holds even on rational instances with of full column rank. The proof was first obtained using a fully automated Gemini-based agentic system developed internally at Google. The authors have verified the proof and edited it for clarity of presentation.
Source: arXiv:2608.02588v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02588v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.02588v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02588v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Aug 4, 2026
Data Science
Machine Learning
0