Advances in Machine Learning for Directed Evolution: A Five-Year Retrospective
Abstract
The last five-plus years have seen many protein engineering disciplines transformed by advances in machine learning (ML), but the same cannot be said for directed evolution. Reflecting on a previously co-authored perspective, I discuss why I believe this to be the case, arguing that a disconnect between the goals of machine-learning-assisted directed evolution (MLDE) researchers--"identify an optimal protein"--and the goals of directed evolution more broadly--"identify a sufficient protein given...
Description / Details
The last five-plus years have seen many protein engineering disciplines transformed by advances in machine learning (ML), but the same cannot be said for directed evolution. Reflecting on a previously co-authored perspective, I discuss why I believe this to be the case, arguing that a disconnect between the goals of machine-learning-assisted directed evolution (MLDE) researchers--"identify an optimal protein"--and the goals of directed evolution more broadly--"identify a sufficient protein given time and resource constraints"--is a principal culprit. As an example, I highlight how nearly all current MLDE methods neglect to account for the cost of DNA synthesis, resulting in strategies that have limited practical applicability regardless of the underlying models' capabilities. I close by discussing recent works that are exceptions to this overarching trend, and emphasize that the last five years of efforts in ML-assisted protein engineering and the prescribed reframe of MLDE objectives need not be mutually exclusive.
Source: arXiv:2609.03046v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03046v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.03046v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03046v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Sep 4, 2026
Pharmaceutical Research
Biochemistry
0