RegionFed: Federated Learning for Personalized Query Understanding in Heterogeneous Retail Environments
Abstract
Retail search systems serve diverse geographic regions with distinct query patterns, vocabularies, and product preferences, creating significant data heterogeneity that challenges both privacy-preserving training and model personalization. Federated learning offers a natural solution for privacy, but standard FL methods produce global models that sacrifice regional performance, while existing personalized FL approaches operate at the parameter level and catastrophically collapse on modern transf...
Description / Details
Retail search systems serve diverse geographic regions with distinct query patterns, vocabularies, and product preferences, creating significant data heterogeneity that challenges both privacy-preserving training and model personalization. Federated learning offers a natural solution for privacy, but standard FL methods produce global models that sacrifice regional performance, while existing personalized FL approaches operate at the parameter level and catastrophically collapse on modern transformers (below 10% accuracy on T5) due to tied embeddings and LayerNorm interactions. We introduce RegionFed, an \textit{architecture-robust} federated learning framework that sidesteps this failure by operating entirely at the gradient level. RegionFed uses the conflict between regional and global gradients as a unified signal that (i) diagnoses heterogeneity, (ii) routes each region to the cheapest sufficient personalization strategy, and (iii) adaptively controls personalization strength. Because it treats models as differentiable black boxes, RegionFed deploys on T5-Small, T5-3B, RoBERTa, and CNN with zero code changes, providing large gains on transformers (where parameter-level methods collapse) and consistent improvements on CNNs. Across three public datasets (Amazon ESCI, Amazon Reviews, LEAF-FEMNIST) and four architectures, RegionFed-Meta achieves 92.27%, closing the gap to the privacy-violating centralized upper bound (Centralized + Regional Weighting: 92.04%, =0.23pp, within 1) while providing -differential privacy and convergence.
Source: arXiv:2609.05403v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05403v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.05403v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05403v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Sep 7, 2026
Artificial Intelligence
AI
0