Back to Explorer
Research PaperResearchia:202603.04042[Chemistry > Chemistry]

High-quality, high-information dataset for universal atomistic machine learning

Cesare Malosso

Abstract

The quality, consistency, and information content of training data is often what determines the practical value of machine-learning models for atomistic simulations. Yet, many widely used electronic-structure databases are assembled having materials screening as primary goal rather than robust force-field learning, are limited in their scope to a specific class of chemical compounds, and/or employ inconsistent DFT functionals and settings. Here we introduce MAD-1.5, a highly curated dataset designed explicitly for training broadly applicable atomistic models across the periodic table at high levels of theory. MAD-1.5 extends the MAD dataset with targeted enrichment strategies that improve the coverage of chemical space to 102 elements while keeping the total number of configurations compact. All structures are computed with a single, standardized all-electron DFT workflow using the r2^2SCAN meta-GGA functional and consistent convergence settings, ensuring uniformity across chemically heterogeneous systems. The dataset encompasses molecules, clusters, bulk crystals, surfaces, and low-dimensional structures, and its quality and consistency are further enhanced by outlier removal using uncertainty quantification. We demonstrate the high accuracy that can be achieved with the proposed dataset by training PET-MAD-1.5, a generally applicable r2^2SCAN interatomic potential that covers 102 elements in the periodic table and achieves exceptional levels of benchmark accuracy and stability in challenging simulation protocols.


Source: arXiv:2603.02089v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02089v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.02089v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02089v1

Submission:3/4/2026
Comments:0 comments
Subjects:Chemistry; Chemistry
Original Source:
View Original PDF
arXiv: This paper is hosted on arXiv, an open-access repository
Was this helpful?

Discussion (0)

Please sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!