ExplorerData ScienceMachine Learning
Research PaperResearchia:202606.02023

Physics-Informed Residuals for Adaptive Mesh Refinement in Finite-Difference PDE Solvers

Henry Kasumba

Abstract

Classical finite-difference solvers remain reliable tools for partial differential equations, but their efficiency depends on where mesh resolution is placed. Uniform refinement can waste degrees of freedom when solution difficulty is localised near sharp gradients, fronts, oscillations, or constraint-sensitive regions. This paper studies a hybrid strategy in which a physics-informed neural network (PINN) is used not as the final solver, but as an off-grid residual probe for adaptive mesh refine...

Submitted: June 2, 2026Subjects: Machine Learning; Data Science

Description / Details

Classical finite-difference solvers remain reliable tools for partial differential equations, but their efficiency depends on where mesh resolution is placed. Uniform refinement can waste degrees of freedom when solution difficulty is localised near sharp gradients, fronts, oscillations, or constraint-sensitive regions. This paper studies a hybrid strategy in which a physics-informed neural network (PINN) is used not as the final solver, but as an off-grid residual probe for adaptive mesh refinement. The PINN residual is sampled over the domain, converted into cellwise indicators, and used to guide refinement before the final approximation is computed by a finite-difference solver. The method is evaluated on three benchmarks. The main full-solver validation uses the one-dimensional viscous Burgers equation with a nonuniform finite-difference solve on the adapted meshes. PINN-threshold refinement attains final relative L2L^2 error 0.0210670.021067 with 6060 degrees of freedom, compared with 0.0226170.022617 for uniform refinement with 192192 degrees of freedom. At matched mesh size, PINN-threshold reduces the error by about 67.5%67.5\%. PINN-D"orfler refinement gives similar performance, with error 0.0212640.021264 using 5858 degrees of freedom. A gradient indicator remains slightly more accurate, so the result supports usefulness rather than universal superiority. Manufactured 2D and 3D proxy tests, based on a nonlinear Schr"odinger equation and an incompressible Navier--Stokes system, show that PINN residuals can organise structured refinement and improve over random refinement, although they do not consistently outperform gradient or uniform baselines. The results support PINN-guided AMR as a residual-indicator strategy for transferring physics-informed diagnostic information into finite-difference mesh adaptation while preserving the classical solver as the final approximation engine.


Source: arXiv:2606.02475v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02475v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.02475v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02475v1

Please sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Access Paper
View Source PDF
Submission Info
Date:
Jun 2, 2026
Topic:
Data Science
Area:
Machine Learning
Comments:
0
Bookmark
Physics-Informed Residuals for Adaptive Mesh Refinement in Finite-Difference PDE Solvers | Researchia