Fast Learning Rates for Physics-Informed Kernel Methods
Abstract
In physics-informed machine learning, a target function $u^$ is learned from noisy value observations $y_i=u^(x_i)+ \varepsilon_i$, together with differential information, given either by noisy observations $d_j=(Du^)(z_j)+ΞΎ_j$ or by a known physical constraint $Du^=v$. We consider the setting where $D$ is a linear differential operator and analyze a physics-informed kernel estimator $\hat u$ combining $n$ value observations and $m$ differential observations. In this context, we ask how much can...
Description / Details
In physics-informed machine learning, a target function is learned from noisy value observations , together with differential information, given either by noisy observations or by a known physical constraint . We consider the setting where is a linear differential operator and analyze a physics-informed kernel estimator combining value observations and differential observations. In this context, we ask how much can differential information improve predictions, and how does this improvement depend quantitatively on , , and . We prove finite-sample bounds, supported by numerical simulations, revealing a two-regime structure for the prediction error. When is limited, the rate depends jointly on and ; when exceeds a problem-dependent threshold, the rate saturates and matches the oracle rate obtained when the perfect constraint is imposed. Examples are discussed for Sobolev spaces which are reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces and include partial Laplacian constraints on the torus and gradient observations on bounded domains. These examples illustrate the range of possible learning rate improvements --- from the standard nonparametric to the parametric rate . Finally, we derive physically consistent rates in a stronger norm that jointly controls the errors in and .
Source: arXiv:2609.18901v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18901v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.18901v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18901v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Sep 17, 2026
Data Science
Statistics
0