Parameterized Complexity of $L_p$-Lipschitz Constants for Input Convex Neural Networks and $L_p$-Norm Maximization over Zonotopes
Abstract
Lipschitz constants are a standard way to quantify the sensitivity of neural networks to small input perturbations, but computing them is difficult even for shallow ReLU networks. We study this problem for two-layer input-convex neural networks (ICNNs), a restricted architecture where nonnegative output weights enforce convexity. Computing the $L_p$-Lipschitz constant for these networks is equivalent to maximizing the dual norm over a zonotope. While $L_1$- and $L_\infty$-norm maximization on zo...
Description / Details
Lipschitz constants are a standard way to quantify the sensitivity of neural networks to small input perturbations, but computing them is difficult even for shallow ReLU networks. We study this problem for two-layer input-convex neural networks (ICNNs), a restricted architecture where nonnegative output weights enforce convexity. Computing the -Lipschitz constant for these networks is equivalent to maximizing the dual norm over a zonotope. While - and -norm maximization on zonotopes admit fixed-parameter and polynomial-time algorithms, respectively, the parameterized complexity of the remaining -norms was open. We prove that, for every fixed , maximizing the -norm over a zonotope in is W[1]-hard with respect to the dimension . Moreover, our hardness results imply that brute-force enumeration algorithms are essentially optimal for this problem under the Exponential Time Hypothesis. By duality, the same hardness results hold for computing the -Lipschitz constant of two-layer ReLU ICNNs. Our proof first establishes the result for the -norm and then transfers the construction to arbitrary fixed using a suitable Taylor approximation. These results resolve the corresponding questions regarding the parameterized complexity status for zonotope norm maximization and two-layer ICNN Lipschitz constants. Our paper resolves an open problem posted at COLT'25. There are several independent concurrent papers resolving the same problem. Our paper prioritizes a clear exposition of the underlying mathematics and conceptual intuitions behind the proof. Additionally, we explicitly describe our research process including the use of LLMs.
Source: arXiv:2608.24865v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.24865v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.24865v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.24865v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Aug 26, 2026
Data Science
Machine Learning
0