Reference-Density Hartree Screening for Gausslet Hamiltonians
Abstract
Gausslets are among the few electronic-structure bases that permit the four-index electron--electron interaction to be replaced by an accurate two-index integral diagonal approximation (IDA). Near a many-electron nucleus, however, the nuclear attraction and core-electron Hartree field are individually large and substantially cancel. Treating the first as a full finite-basis matrix while treating the second with IDA leaves an avoidable imbalance. We introduce reference-density Hartree screening: ...
Description / Details
Gausslets are among the few electronic-structure bases that permit the four-index electron--electron interaction to be replaced by an accurate two-index integral diagonal approximation (IDA). Near a many-electron nucleus, however, the nuclear attraction and core-electron Hartree field are individually large and substantially cancel. Treating the first as a full finite-basis matrix while treating the second with IDA leaves an avoidable imbalance. We introduce reference-density Hartree screening: the Hartree field of a chosen reference density is represented accurately, and IDA is applied only to density fluctuations about it. Tests on He, Ne, atomic F, F, and Cr show large reductions in direct Hartree errors, including transfer of fitted neutral-atom fields to molecules. For Cr, atomic-core screening prevents the spurious HF collapse found with the unscreened and Hamiltonians, whereas finite-reference matching without screening does not. Screening leaves exchange and residual correlation unchanged. We therefore also introduce a low-rank one-particle correction that uses an accurate conventional Gaussian-basis Hartree--Fock calculation to match either occupied-space exchange information or the complete occupied Fock vectors. In F and Cr, reproduces the finite-reference energy and occupied Fock vectors to numerical precision and the selected states return after orbital perturbations. For Cr, the corrected basis uses one quarter as many functions as the control while retaining sub-mHa mean-field accuracy. Screening provides the physical improvement to the direct field; the state-specific correction then restores the remaining accuracy of the Gaussian-basis mean-field reference.
Source: arXiv:2609.01459v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01459v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.01459v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01459v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Sep 2, 2026
Chemistry
Chemistry
0