An Argmax Principle for Sum-of-Squares Relaxations on the Sphere
Abstract
We develop an argmax principle for analyzing sum-of-squares relaxations of optimization problems over the unit sphere. Given a feasible pseudo-expectation, we form a polynomial of high-order pseudo-moments, such as $Φ_k(u)=\widetilde{\mathbb E}\langle x,u\rangle^{2k}$. Our guiding principle is that its maximizers are rounding candidates: their local and global optimality conditions reveal the reweighed pseudo-expectation inequalities governing SoS convergence. This viewpoint unifies several prob...
Description / Details
We develop an argmax principle for analyzing sum-of-squares relaxations of optimization problems over the unit sphere. Given a feasible pseudo-expectation, we form a polynomial of high-order pseudo-moments, such as . Our guiding principle is that its maximizers are rounding candidates: their local and global optimality conditions reveal the reweighed pseudo-expectation inequalities governing SoS convergence. This viewpoint unifies several problems previously analyzed by rather different techniques. We obtain three results. First, for Best Separable State, we give a degree- SoS analysis for approximating in the perfect-completeness regime, improving and simplifying Barak, Kothari and Steurer (STOC'17). The dependence is essentially tight for inverse-linear gap under the Exponential-Time Hypothesis, matching hardness from protocols. Second, for the matrix norm, degree- SoS gives a multiplicative approximation. Barak et al. (STOC'12) previously gave a comparable-time constant-gap decision algorithm; our result gives a multiplicative guarantee and extends to a family of norms with even . Finally, for degree- polynomial optimization, we recover the convergence theorem of Bhattiprolu et al. (FOCS'17) with a shorter, more direct proof: degree- SoS gives approximation ratio . The paper introduces no new relaxation. Instead, the high-moment argmax gives a common way to read an SoS solution, unifying previously separate convergence analyses and yielding sharper bounds or simpler proofs.
Source: arXiv:2608.02594v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02594v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.02594v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02594v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Aug 4, 2026
Quantum Computing
Quantum Physics
0