Dynamical mechanisms of flexible phase-locking in cortical theta oscillators
Abstract
Oscillatory activity in auditory cortex is thought to play a central role in auditory and speech processing by synchronizing neural rhythms to external acoustic features of the speech stream. To support this function, cortical oscillators must flexibly phase-lock to inputs spanning a wide range of timescales, including rhythms substantially slower than their intrinsic frequency. Here we identify a general dynamical mechanism by which intrinsic inhibitory currents operating on multiple timescales...
Description / Details
Oscillatory activity in auditory cortex is thought to play a central role in auditory and speech processing by synchronizing neural rhythms to external acoustic features of the speech stream. To support this function, cortical oscillators must flexibly phase-lock to inputs spanning a wide range of timescales, including rhythms substantially slower than their intrinsic frequency. Here we identify a general dynamical mechanism by which intrinsic inhibitory currents operating on multiple timescales enable such flexible phase-locking. Using tools from dynamical systems theory, we show that interactions between slow and superslow inhibitory processes generate prolonged post-input recovery delays through delayed Hopf phenomena, thereby substantially expanding the frequency range over which entrainment can occur. We demonstrate this mechanisms in a biophysically grounded cortical theta oscillator model for speech segmentation. Specifically, we show that both a theta-timescale (4-8 Hz) inhibitory current and a slower delta-timescale (1-4 Hz) inhibitory potassium current are crucial for entrainment flexibility. Their interaction creates a three-timescale structure that gives rise to pronounced delay phenomena associated with a delayed Hopf bifurcation (DHB). Interestingly, the superslow and the associated DHB play little role in the unforced oscillatory dynamics, but are recruited to support phase locking under external forcing. Moreover, the intermediate-timescale current , rather than being redundant, further expands the phase-locking range by prolonging delayed recovery along the superslow manifold. Together, these results suggest that coordination among intrinsic inhibitory currents operating on multiple timescales may represent a key mechanism supporting flexible phase locking to rhythmic inputs in the brain.
Source: arXiv:2605.08014v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08014v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.08014v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08014v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
May 11, 2026
Neuroscience
Neuroscience
0