ExplorerArtificial IntelligenceAI
Research PaperResearchia:202608.04069

Magnet: Detecting Cross-Session AI Misuse Through Capability Accumulation

Natalie Isak

Abstract

The most capable AI deployments are not single models but ensembles of specialized agents that delegate and act in coordination. This architecture unlocks powerful new capabilities, and it also introduces risks that existing frameworks for monitoring, detection, and mitigation were not designed to address. Most state-of-the-art AI abuse detection literature focuses on single-turn or multi-turn (single-session) threat models. This leaves a critical gap: an attacker can decompose a harmful goal in...

Submitted: August 4, 2026Subjects: AI; Artificial Intelligence

Description / Details

The most capable AI deployments are not single models but ensembles of specialized agents that delegate and act in coordination. This architecture unlocks powerful new capabilities, and it also introduces risks that existing frameworks for monitoring, detection, and mitigation were not designed to address. Most state-of-the-art AI abuse detection literature focuses on single-turn or multi-turn (single-session) threat models. This leaves a critical gap: an attacker can decompose a harmful goal into innocuous-looking units and execute each in isolated agentic sessions. The agent is stateless between conversations, but the attacker is not. This asymmetry allows for cross-session trajectories that are effective at evading detection. Our contributions are twofold. First, we demonstrate cross-session goal decomposition as an evasion technique, showing it may elicit more harmful capability than equivalent single-session or multi-turn attacks. By capability we mean an artifact produced at one step of an objective, evidenced by what an interaction produced (model responses and tool-call results), and composable with capabilities accrued elsewhere into a harmful whole. Second, we propose Magnet: an efficient and robust detection approach that models relevant capabilities accrued over time and across agentic conversations, aggregated at a higher-level correlator (in this case, a user ID) rather than per-conversation state. The main challenge is assembling the evidence bundle Magnet reasons over. The incriminating artifacts may be needles scattered through a haystack of benign sessions that are individually harmless, dangerous only once collected. Rather than searching the haystack straw-by-straw (i.e. per-session inspection), Magnet does what its name implies: it attracts the relevant needles out of the hay, across sessions and across time, into a compact evidence bundle a detector can act on.


Source: arXiv:2608.02518v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02518v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.02518v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02518v1

Please sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Access Paper
View Source PDF
Submission Info
Date:
Aug 4, 2026
Topic:
Artificial Intelligence
Area:
AI
Comments:
0
Bookmark