Efficient Block Encoding of Structured Hamiltonians by Separating Where and What
Abstract
Fault-tolerant block encodings of structured Hamiltonians can reduce their non-Clifford cost in SELECT by selecting where an operator acts separately from what is applied. We construct permute-act-unpermute circuits whose CSWAP networks exploit the support geometry: a selected support is brought to a fixed target register, a shared local circuit acts there, and the permutation is undone. For supports of fixed size, the $T$ count of SELECT then grows with the system size rather than with the numb...
Description / Details
Fault-tolerant block encodings of structured Hamiltonians can reduce their non-Clifford cost in SELECT by selecting where an operator acts separately from what is applied. We construct permute-act-unpermute circuits whose CSWAP networks exploit the support geometry: a selected support is brought to a fixed target register, a shared local circuit acts there, and the permutation is undone. For supports of fixed size, the count of SELECT then grows with the system size rather than with the number of terms, without requiring translational symmetry or factorised coefficients. For two-site supports, we establish and attain the minimum CSWAP count within address-controlled networks of site transpositions. Compiled for Pauli terms, these circuits use gates with permutation work qubits, where is the number of system qubits and is determined by the support geometry, with for nearest-neighbour interactions and for all-to-all pairs. We also introduce a bridged CSWAP that retains and repairs a temporary AND across the target action. When the repair is Clifford, it halves the count of a matched forward-inverse CSWAP pair at the cost of one retained work qubit. For a Heisenberg ring, the complete block-encoding query reduces the count by a factor approaching 3 as the system size grows. For a five-orbital Anderson impurity model, which combines nearest-neighbour and all-to-all support geometries, the reduction is about 1.7 at large bath sizes. Both comparisons use the lowest-cost compiled baselines considered, at unchanged block-encoding normalisation and comparable peak ancilla counts.
Source: arXiv:2610.03686v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03686v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.03686v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03686v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Oct 5, 2026
Quantum Computing
Quantum Physics
0