Explorerโ€บPharmaceutical Researchโ€บBiochemistry
Research PaperResearchia:202609.28023

Improving Molecular-Morphology Contrastive Pretraining using Deep-Learning-based Morphology Profiles

Jie Li

Abstract

Recent advancements in image-based profiling techniques have enabled the collection of high-volume cell morphology data, allowing new molecular embedding models to learn from the experimental phenotypic perturbations of a molecule in a cell. Previously, we developed Molecule-Morphology Contrastive Pretraining (MoCoP), a strategy for aligning small molecule embeddings to morphology fingerprints extracted through CellProfiler. The resulting molecular representation showed transferable performance ...

Submitted: September 28, 2026Subjects: Biochemistry; Pharmaceutical Research

Description / Details

Recent advancements in image-based profiling techniques have enabled the collection of high-volume cell morphology data, allowing new molecular embedding models to learn from the experimental phenotypic perturbations of a molecule in a cell. Previously, we developed Molecule-Morphology Contrastive Pretraining (MoCoP), a strategy for aligning small molecule embeddings to morphology fingerprints extracted through CellProfiler. The resulting molecular representation showed transferable performance for quantitative structure--activity relationship (QSAR) prediction tasks. Here, we extend the method by using a deep-learning-based cell image encoding pipeline to extract more feature-rich morphology profiles and align them to the molecular embeddings through contrastive learning. The new embeddings encode more accurate information on how molecules perturb cell morphology and enable improvements for QSAR predictions through either fixed-embedding linear probes or fully flexible fine-tuning. Morphology retrieval performance scales log-linearly with training data size, suggesting continued improvements as larger datasets become available. The improved MoCoP v2 also achieves superior performance on toxicity prediction and competitive results on ADME and activity benchmarks, when compared with existing molecular embedding models that use both cell morphology and transcriptomic data during training.


Source: arXiv:2609.30433v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30433v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.30433v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30433v1

Please sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Access Paper
View Source PDF
Submission Info
Date:
Sep 28, 2026
Topic:
Pharmaceutical Research
Area:
Biochemistry
Comments:
0
Bookmark