ExplorerArtificial IntelligenceAI
Research PaperResearchia:202608.26067

Right Diagnoses, Decorative Reasoning:A Perturbation Audit of Medical Chain-of-Thought

Mengzhu Xu

Abstract

Clinicians read chain-of-thought (CoT) rationales as evidence of medical reasoning, but whether the visible chain plays that role is rarely tested. General-domain CoT-faithfulness probes ignore clinical cost, and medical LLM evaluations treat the chain as a black box. We close this gap with a medical perturbation audit: a 30-operator battery edits both the chain and the question with clinically motivated operators (severity reversal, negation flip, demographic swap, evidence ablation), paired wi...

Submitted: August 26, 2026Subjects: AI; Artificial Intelligence

Description / Details

Clinicians read chain-of-thought (CoT) rationales as evidence of medical reasoning, but whether the visible chain plays that role is rarely tested. General-domain CoT-faithfulness probes ignore clinical cost, and medical LLM evaluations treat the chain as a black box. We close this gap with a medical perturbation audit: a 30-operator battery edits both the chain and the question with clinically motivated operators (severity reversal, negation flip, demographic swap, evidence ablation), paired with a chain-update times answer-flip joint analysis that classifies each model by its failure mode. Applied to 14 LLMs on four medical QA benchmarks, three independent tests converge: the Chain-Decoupling Rate (CDR; chain does not register the edit and the answer does not flip) is 72.9% panel-wide on clinically meaningful destructive edits, chain corruption leaves accuracy unchanged, and removing CoT prompting does not reduce accuracy. Two board-certified clinicians re-annotate N=197 perturbed questions; 98.5% leave the gold defensible. The pattern holds across medical and reasoning fine-tuning and scale; on the closed-source tier, where the chain text is unavailable, the answer-side signals are consistent with the same decoupling. Our framework and CDR provide a reusable yardstick for auditing whether medical CoT is faithful or merely documentation.


Source: arXiv:2608.24790v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.24790v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.24790v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.24790v1

Please sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Access Paper
View Source PDF
Submission Info
Date:
Aug 26, 2026
Topic:
Artificial Intelligence
Area:
AI
Comments:
0
Bookmark