ExplorerComputational LinguisticsNLP
Research PaperResearchia:202607.02007

Is One Layer Enough? Training A Single Transformer Layer Can Match Full-Parameter RL Training

Zijian Zhang

Abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a central component of post-training large language models (LLMs), yet little is understood about how RL adaptation is distributed across transformer layers. Existing approaches typically update all model parameters uniformly, implicitly assuming that every layer contributes similarly to the gains obtained during RL post-training. In this work, we challenge this assumption through a systematic layer-wise study of RL training. Surprisingly, we find that trai...

Submitted: July 2, 2026Subjects: NLP; Computational Linguistics

Description / Details

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a central component of post-training large language models (LLMs), yet little is understood about how RL adaptation is distributed across transformer layers. Existing approaches typically update all model parameters uniformly, implicitly assuming that every layer contributes similarly to the gains obtained during RL post-training. In this work, we challenge this assumption through a systematic layer-wise study of RL training. Surprisingly, we find that training a single transformer layer can recover most of the gains achieved by full-parameter RL training, and in some cases even surpass it. To quantify this phenomenon, we introduce the quantity layer contribution, which measures the fraction of full RL improvement recovered by training a layer in isolation. Across seven models spanning two model families (Qwen3, Qwen2.5), three RL algorithms (GRPO, GiGPO, Dr. GRPO), and multiple task domains including mathematical reasoning, code generation, and agentic decision-making, we observe a remarkably stable pattern: RL gains are highly concentrated in a small subset of, and in many cases even a single, transformer layers. More strikingly, the same structural pattern consistently emerges: high-contribution layers concentrate in the middle of the transformer stack, while layers near the input and output ends contribute substantially less. The resulting layer rankings remain strongly correlated across datasets, tasks, model families, and RL algorithms.


Source: arXiv:2607.01232v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01232v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.01232v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01232v1

Please sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Access Paper
View Source PDF
Submission Info
Date:
Jul 2, 2026
Topic:
Computational Linguistics
Area:
NLP
Comments:
0
Bookmark