$\mathsf{EFI}\Leftrightarrow\mathsf{1PRS}$
Abstract
A series of recent works has established EFI pairs as the "minimal" assumption for quantum cryptography. Recently, Cavalar et al. [CCC+26] showed that EFI pairs are equivalent to non-uniform expanding single-copy pseudorandom state generators (1PRS), and obtained a non-uniform meta-complexity characterization of EFI pairs. We remove the non-uniformity in their construction and prove that EFI pairs are equivalent to expanding 1PRS. As a corollary, we obtain the first uniform meta-complexity chara...
Description / Details
A series of recent works has established EFI pairs as the "minimal" assumption for quantum cryptography. Recently, Cavalar et al. [CCC+26] showed that EFI pairs are equivalent to non-uniform expanding single-copy pseudorandom state generators (1PRS), and obtained a non-uniform meta-complexity characterization of EFI pairs. We remove the non-uniformity in their construction and prove that EFI pairs are equivalent to expanding 1PRS. As a corollary, we obtain the first uniform meta-complexity characterization of EFI pairs. Together with the equivalence of statistically verifiable one-way state generators and commitments proved by Batra and Jain [BJ24], this gives a quantum analogue of the classical equivalence between one-way functions, commitments, and pseudorandom generators.
Source: arXiv:2610.18799v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18799v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.18799v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18799v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Oct 14, 2026
Computer Science
Cybersecurity
0