Probabilistic Risk Sensitivity and Loss Aversion in Cumulative Prospect Theory
Abstract
This paper develops a binary-gamble framework for characterizing risk sensitivity and loss aversion in Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT). The proposed probabilistic risk-sensitivity metric is defined as a probability-threshold ratio that determines acceptance and preference thresholds in choice problems involving either a certain outcome and a binary gamble or two binary gambles. We show how standard notions of symmetric and non-symmetric bet aversion can be recovered within this framework, and w...
Description / Details
This paper develops a binary-gamble framework for characterizing risk sensitivity and loss aversion in Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT). The proposed probabilistic risk-sensitivity metric is defined as a probability-threshold ratio that determines acceptance and preference thresholds in choice problems involving either a certain outcome and a binary gamble or two binary gambles. We show how standard notions of symmetric and non-symmetric bet aversion can be recovered within this framework, and we compare the resulting threshold-based conditions with utility premia, probability premia, and Arrow--Pratt curvature measures. The analysis clarifies when these criteria coincide and when they diverge, particularly for increasing aversion conditions, binary gambles with unequal probability distributions, and settings involving probability weighting functions. We also identify technical restrictions that arise when CPT-utility functions are used to represent loss aversion at the reference point. The resulting framework provides a decision-theoretic interpretation of risk sensitivity that is directly tied to probability thresholds and complements existing premium-based approaches.
Source: arXiv:2606.06652v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06652v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.06652v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06652v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Jun 8, 2026
Environmental Science
Economics
0