ExplorerQuantum ComputingQuantum Physics
Research PaperResearchia:202606.11075

An iterative Ising decoder for quantum error correction codes

Yuanqi Liu

Abstract

The Ising framework maps the decoding problem in quantum error correction onto ground-state optimization of a classical Hamiltonian, in which $X$-$Z$ error correlations enter as cross terms. Under phenomenological depolarizing noise, the exact joint formulation contains up to 8-body interactions for the toric code and 10-body for the $6.6.6$ color code. These high-order terms degrade solver convergence, inflate runtime, and raise the auxiliary spin overhead when embedding into native 2-body Isin...

Submitted: June 11, 2026Subjects: Quantum Physics; Quantum Computing

Description / Details

The Ising framework maps the decoding problem in quantum error correction onto ground-state optimization of a classical Hamiltonian, in which XX-ZZ error correlations enter as cross terms. Under phenomenological depolarizing noise, the exact joint formulation contains up to 8-body interactions for the toric code and 10-body for the 6.6.66.6.6 color code. These high-order terms degrade solver convergence, inflate runtime, and raise the auxiliary spin overhead when embedding into native 2-body Ising hardware. In this work, we propose the iterative low-order decoding (ILOD) algorithm, which alternates between XX- and ZZ-type sub-Hamiltonians, approximating cross-type correlations through Bayesian priors that reweight each type's couplings using the other type's inferred error configuration. This halves the maximum body count of interaction terms in the Hamiltonian, accelerating the solver, restoring convergence at larger code distances, and reducing the total spin count for 2-body embedding by a factor of 2.52.5. For the toric code, ILOD attains a threshold of 4.734.73% versus 4.834.83% for the joint formulation, with the empirical runtime ratio scaling as (0.81)d(0.81)^d. For the 6.6.66.6.6 color code, their thresholds agree within statistical uncertainty for small code distances, and ILOD remains convergent for larger distances where the joint formulation fails to converge despite a larger annealing budget.


Source: arXiv:2606.12301v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12301v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.12301v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12301v1

Please sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Access Paper
View Source PDF
Submission Info
Date:
Jun 11, 2026
Topic:
Quantum Computing
Area:
Quantum Physics
Comments:
0
Bookmark