Errorless Irrationality: A unified computational account of the inverse base-rate effect across predictive, observational, and unsupervised procedures

The inverse base-rate effect is a robust bias in how people resolve ambiguity between competing categories, and the most prominent theories explain it through prediction error. Across two experiments we progressively removed the elements of the predictive-learning design that supply such error signals: first by moving to observational learning, then to an unsupervised procedure in which category labels were not presented. The effect persisted--the irrational bias is independent of supervised learning procedures. We propose a new theory, OSCAR, that integrates core computational principles of the best-validated models and operates on self-generated feedback akin to pattern completion. OSCAR extends the learning dynamics underlying the response bias to observational and unsupervised procedures. Evaluated on a large preexisting supervised dataset in addition to the two new experiments reported here, OSCAR performs competitively against alternatives, and is the first model that reproduces the pattern of individual differences seen in humans across all three procedures. The model provides an explanation of hitherto unexplained eye-tracking data, something none of the alternative accounts provide.

Source: arXiv:2608.06149v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06149v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.06149v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06149v1