ExplorerData ScienceMachine Learning
Research PaperResearchia:202607.28070

Beyond Scale and Generation: Understanding Language Model-based Entity Matching

Zeyu Zhang

Abstract

Entity matching identifies records that refer to the same real-world entity. Language models can be adapted to this task through bi-encoder, cross-encoder, and generative matcher architectures. However, prior studies often conflate matcher architecture with differences in model backbone, model variant(reflecting different pretraining objectives), and model size, making it difficult to isolate the sources of performance gains. We address this issue through a controlled factorial study spanning th...

Submitted: July 28, 2026Subjects: Machine Learning; Data Science

Description / Details

Entity matching identifies records that refer to the same real-world entity. Language models can be adapted to this task through bi-encoder, cross-encoder, and generative matcher architectures. However, prior studies often conflate matcher architecture with differences in model backbone, model variant(reflecting different pretraining objectives), and model size, making it difficult to isolate the sources of performance gains. We address this issue through a controlled factorial study spanning three matcher architectures, three model variants and three model sizes from the Qwen3 family, and nine datasets, totaling 1,215 fine-tuning runs. We also evaluate cross-dataset transferability and computational cost. Our results show that model variant is critical for bi-encoders: embedding-oriented variants provide stronger initialization and more favorable representation geometry predictive of downstream matching performance. Cross-encoders retain a consistent advantage over bi-encoders because they jointly encode record pairs rather than representing each record independently, although larger models partially narrow this gap. Generative matchers do not universally outperform cross-encoders. Instead, their advantages concentrate under distribution shift, including subtle unseen differences in record schemas and cross-dataset transfer. We further find that larger models rely more heavily on shortcut learning and therefore do not necessarily perform better. These findings clarify the factors underlying performance differences across matcher architectures and motivate future research and benchmark designs that better disentangle architectural choices from model-level factors while explicitly evaluating distribution shift and cross-dataset transferability. We release our experimental results, code, training scripts, and evaluation data at https://github.com/Jantory/llm-trained-matcher.


Source: arXiv:2607.24688v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24688v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.24688v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24688v1

Please sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Access Paper
View Source PDF
Submission Info
Date:
Jul 28, 2026
Topic:
Data Science
Area:
Machine Learning
Comments:
0
Bookmark