Contravariance Theory: Strong Alignment for Minimal Solutions to Hard Tasks

A series of results from the NeuroAI over the past fifteen years have raised core questions both about how to compare Deep Neural Network (DNN) models to the brain, and about how much convergent evolution to expect between artificial networks and real brain networks. Here, we show that for any two minimal DNN solutions to a sufficiently hard task: (i) "weak" alignment of network representations based on affine mappings guarantees "strong" alignment of privileged axes, and (ii) alignment "zippers" up the network hierarchy, causing the emergence of privileged axes from end-to-end task optimization. These results formalize the notion of contravariance from Cao and Yamins [2024], and illustrate important consequences for the theory of NeuroAI: with sufficiently strong tasks, choice of metric for inter-network comparison is not all that sensitive, and that convergent evolution is probably inevitable.

Source: arXiv:2607.08561v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.08561v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.08561v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.08561v1