Back to Explorer
Research PaperResearchia:202604.07017[Data Science > Machine Learning]

PINNs in PDE Constrained Optimal Control Problems: Direct vs Indirect Methods

Zhen Zhang

Abstract

We study physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) as numerical tools for the optimal control of semilinear partial differential equations. We first recall the classical direct and indirect viewpoints for optimal control of PDEs, and then present two PINN formulations: a direct formulation based on minimizing the objective under the state constraint, and an indirect formulation based on the first-order optimality system. For a class of semilinear parabolic equations, we derive the state equation, the adjoint equation, and the stationarity condition in a form consistent with continuous-time Pontryagin-type optimality conditions. We then specialize the framework to an Allen-Cahn control problem and compare three numerical approaches: (i) a discretize-then-optimize adjoint method, (ii) a direct PINN, and (iii) an indirect PINN. Numerical results show that the PINN parameterization has an implicit regularizing effect, in the sense that it tends to produce smoother control profiles. They also indicate that the indirect PINN more faithfully preserves the PDE contraint and optimality structure and yields a more accurate neural approximation than the direct PINN.


Source: arXiv:2604.04920v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04920v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.04920v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04920v1

Submission:4/7/2026
Comments:0 comments
Subjects:Machine Learning; Data Science
Original Source:
View Original PDF
arXiv: This paper is hosted on arXiv, an open-access repository
Was this helpful?

Discussion (0)

Please sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

PINNs in PDE Constrained Optimal Control Problems: Direct vs Indirect Methods | Researchia