Flux-Corrected Diagonal Frog: second order and positivity at all time steps
Abstract
By Godunov's theorem, linear second-order finite-difference schemes for the Fokker-Planck equation cannot preserve positivity. The Diagonal Frog (DF) framework previously bypassed this barrier using eventual positivity, but required a strict minimum time step. This paper resolves the small-step limitation using a nonlinear extension of the DF solvers. We split the second-order directional operator into a monotone M-matrix core and an antidiffusive flux correction. A Zalesak-type limiter is then ...
Description / Details
By Godunov's theorem, linear second-order finite-difference schemes for the Fokker-Planck equation cannot preserve positivity. The Diagonal Frog (DF) framework previously bypassed this barrier using eventual positivity, but required a strict minimum time step. This paper resolves the small-step limitation using a nonlinear extension of the DF solvers. We split the second-order directional operator into a monotone M-matrix core and an antidiffusive flux correction. A Zalesak-type limiter is then applied iteratively within the implicit banded solve. The resulting Flux-Corrected DF (FCDF) schemes (variants A and B) are unconditionally positive across all time steps. Because the limiter acts on fluxes rather than point values, these schemes conserve discrete mass exactly and maintain second-order accuracy. Crucially, the limiter activates only within unresolved layers. This ensures the global convergence remains second-order uniformly in the cell Péclet number, avoiding the first-order degradation seen in the Chang-Cooper scheme. The method's Picard iteration is contractive under a purely convective step restriction. To support arbitrary step sizes, we develop an active-set reformulation. This solves the system using a semismooth Newton iteration, where computational cost scales only with the number of nodes where positivity binds. Finally, we introduce a defect-corrected time stepping approach that restores second-order time accuracy. Numerical experiments on Ornstein-Uhlenbeck and advection-dominated benchmarks confirm our claims.
Source: arXiv:2607.20415v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20415v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.20415v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20415v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Jul 23, 2026
Mathematics
Mathematics
0