Cometary ion dynamics at a weakly outgassing comet
Abstract
The ESA/Rosetta mission escorted comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko for two years, exploring its plasma environment across diverse outgassing conditions. Plasma density observations from the Rosetta Plasma Consortium (RPC) are broadly categorized into two regimes for the ion dynamics, linked to the presence of a diamagnetic cavity at Rosetta's location. With a diamagnetic cavity present, ions detected by Rosetta are accelerated with respect to the neutral coma. Without a diamagnetic cavity present,...
Description / Details
The ESA/Rosetta mission escorted comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko for two years, exploring its plasma environment across diverse outgassing conditions. Plasma density observations from the Rosetta Plasma Consortium (RPC) are broadly categorized into two regimes for the ion dynamics, linked to the presence of a diamagnetic cavity at Rosetta's location. With a diamagnetic cavity present, ions detected by Rosetta are accelerated with respect to the neutral coma. Without a diamagnetic cavity present, at lower outgassing, and nearer the nucleus, ions co-move with the neutrals. We examine the transition between regimes following Rosetta's last detection of the cavity in February 2016. During this transition, global 3D plasma models of the cometary ionosphere underestimate plasma densities. To investigate this underestimation, we assess the sensitivity of cometary ion densities to different parameters using a 3D collisional ion test particle model, driven by electromagnetic fields from hybrid modeling. We show that considering cometary electron cooling is necessary to model cometary ion dynamics within 100 km of the surface. Electron temperatures derived from collisional electron modeling affect ion dynamics via the ambipolar electric field, increasing ion number densities. We further show that the cometary electron cooling exobase organizes Rosetta plasma density observations; different ion dynamics regimes are linked to the position of Rosetta relative to the exobase. These findings demonstrate that Rosetta was below this exobase for much of the post-perihelion period. They justify the absence of ion acceleration in plasma density assessments and the use of uniform electron-impact ionization frequencies between Rosetta and the surface during post-perihelion.
Source: arXiv:2606.31658v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31658v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.31658v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31658v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Jul 1, 2026
Space Science
Astrophysics
0