The Complexity of Stoquastic Sparse Hamiltonians
Abstract
Despite having an unnatural definition, $\mathsf{StoqMA}$ plays a central role in Hamiltonian complexity, e.g., in the classification theorem of the complexity of Hamiltonians by Cubitt and Montanaro (SICOMP 2016). Moreover, it lies between the two randomized extensions of $\mathsf{NP}$, $\mathsf{MA}$ and $\mathsf{AM}$. Therefore, understanding the exact power of $\mathsf{StoqMA}$ (and hopefully collapsing it with more natural complexity classes) is of great interest for different reasons. In th...
Description / Details
Despite having an unnatural definition, plays a central role in Hamiltonian complexity, e.g., in the classification theorem of the complexity of Hamiltonians by Cubitt and Montanaro (SICOMP 2016). Moreover, it lies between the two randomized extensions of , and . Therefore, understanding the exact power of (and hopefully collapsing it with more natural complexity classes) is of great interest for different reasons. In this work, we take a step further in understanding this complexity class by showing that the Stoquastic Sparse Hamiltonians problem () is in . Since Stoquastic Local Hamiltonians are -hard, this implies that is -complete. We complement this result by showing that the separable version of is -complete, where is the version of that receives two unentangled proofs.
Source: arXiv:2605.02845v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02845v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.02845v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02845v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
May 5, 2026
Quantum Computing
Quantum Physics
0