Optimal Quantum-Classical Separations for Exact Learning
Abstract
We study exact learning with membership queries for concept classes $\mathcal C\subseteq\{0,1\}^N$, focusing on the relationships among their deterministic, randomized, and quantum query complexities, denoted $\mathsf{D}(\mathcal C)$, $\mathsf{R}(\mathcal C)$, and $\mathsf{Q}(\mathcal C)$, respectively. The two canonical quantum speedups in this model are witnessed by Grover search and Bernstein-Vazirani, leading to the longstanding conjecture $$ \mathsf{R}(\mathcal C)=O(\mathsf{Q}(\mathcal C)^2...
Description / Details
We study exact learning with membership queries for concept classes , focusing on the relationships among their deterministic, randomized, and quantum query complexities, denoted , , and , respectively. The two canonical quantum speedups in this model are witnessed by Grover search and Bernstein-Vazirani, leading to the longstanding conjecture We first refute this conjecture by constructing concept classes and satisfying [ \mathsf{R}(\mathcal C)=Ω!\left(\frac{\mathsf{Q}(\mathcal C)^3\log N}{\log \mathsf{Q}(\mathcal C)}\right) \qquad\text{and}\qquad \mathsf{D}(\mathcal C')=Ω(\mathsf{Q}(\mathcal C')^3\log N). ] The first bound matches the upper bound of Arunachalam et al.[Quantum'21] up to constant factors, while the second matches the upper bound of Servedio and Gortler[SICOMP'04]. In particular, this shows that the saving in the randomized upper bound of Arunachalam et al. fundamentally relies on randomness. Apart from characterizing the optimal relationship between classical and quantum query complexity, our results are the first to show that quantum speedups for learning can go beyond the Grover and Bernstein-Vazirani paradigms.
Source: arXiv:2609.38073v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38073v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.38073v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38073v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Sep 30, 2026
Quantum Computing
Quantum Physics
0