The Complexity of Kemeny Aggregation with Three Rankings
Abstract
The Kemeny rule aggregates rankings by minimizing their total Kendall-tau distance from an aggregate order. We prove that Kemeny Score is NP-complete for exactly three unweighted rankings, even when every candidate pair is split $2$-to-$1$. On the same profiles, the winner, unique-winner, and possible- and necessary-precedence problems are $Θ_2^p$-complete, while recognizing a Kemeny-optimal or uniquely Kemeny-optimal aggregate is coNP-complete. The hard instances induce tournaments of majority ...
Description / Details
The Kemeny rule aggregates rankings by minimizing their total Kendall-tau distance from an aggregate order. We prove that Kemeny Score is NP-complete for exactly three unweighted rankings, even when every candidate pair is split -to-. On the same profiles, the winner, unique-winner, and possible- and necessary-precedence problems are -complete, while recognizing a Kemeny-optimal or uniquely Kemeny-optimal aggregate is coNP-complete. The hard instances induce tournaments of majority dimension exactly . The reduction also determines the exact maximum-cut value from the optimal Kemeny score and recovers a maximum cut from any Kemeny-optimal aggregate. For every fixed and , minimum pairwise support yields a sharp dichotomy: the score problem is NP-complete, the winner and precedence problems are -complete, and the recognition problems are coNP-complete when ; for , the majority tournament is transitive and its unique topological order is the unique Kemeny-optimal aggregate. Exact support suffices in the hard case when , and supports in suffice when . These results give complete fixed-profile-size classifications and transfer to Slater orders, permutation medians, and maximum-likelihood central rankings in the Mallows model. Finally, a six-copy construction proves NP-completeness of both Kemeny Score and Kendall--Tau Center for three pairwise-equidistant rankings that still split every pair -to-. For output candidates, their common distance is , the largest possible for an equidistant triple. The construction gives affine formulas for both optimal values, characterizes all Kemeny-optimal output orders, and shows that the output has a unique Kemeny-optimal order and a unique center exactly when the input has a unique Kemeny-optimal order.
Source: arXiv:2607.28588v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28588v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.28588v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28588v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Jul 31, 2026
Mathematics
Mathematics
0