The Structured Totient Preimage Problem: Reconstruction, Collisions, and Cryptographic Implications
Abstract
We define and study the Structured Totient Preimage (STP) problem as a restricted reconstruction relation with a direct cryptographic motivation. Let $p_1,\ldots,p_k$ be distinct primes of the same bit length and reveal only $x=\prod_{i=1}^k(p_i-1)$. Given $(x,λ,k)$, STP asks for any set of $k$ distinct $λ$-bit primes satisfying this product. The relation is efficiently verifiable, but its reconstruction complexity is not known. We establish three concrete results. First, for factored $x$ we der...
Description / Details
We define and study the Structured Totient Preimage (STP) problem as a restricted reconstruction relation with a direct cryptographic motivation. Let be distinct primes of the same bit length and reveal only . Given , STP asks for any set of distinct -bit primes satisfying this product. The relation is efficiently verifiable, but its reconstruction complexity is not known. We establish three concrete results. First, for factored we derive the exact number of ordered exponent allocations and a bound showing that direct reconstruction is polynomial for fixed when ; this rules out that regime as a basis for a strong hardness claim. Second, we give exhaustive algorithms for reconstruction and collision analysis. Third, we exhaustively evaluate 28 parameter pairs, with , up to for pairs and 4,588,935 prime sets in the largest census. The data quantify non-injectivity through collision participation, maximum multiplicity, and conditional ambiguity in bits. These results isolate STP from general inverse-totient computation and motivate a Structured Totient Preimage Assumption for explicitly growing parameter families. Under such an assumption, STP becomes a candidate preimage-resistant relation whose implications for commitments, proofs of knowledge of multiplicative witnesses, and authentication can be stated precisely. The paper establishes the computational foundation and parameter constraints for those constructions; it does not claim a security reduction or post-quantum hardness.
Source: arXiv:2608.19191v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19191v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.19191v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19191v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Aug 20, 2026
Computer Science
Cybersecurity
0