ExplorerData ScienceMachine Learning
Research PaperResearchia:202607.31060

Change2Task: From Repository Changes to Executable Coding Agent Tasks and Environments

Haomin Qi

Abstract

Scaling coding agents requires a continuing supply of executable data for training, benchmarking, and continuous evaluation. Each task must couple a realistic software state with a specification, development tools, and reliable verification. To expand this supply, we present Change2Task, a system grounded in repository history that converts merged pull requests into verified tasks on healthy modern revisions of the same repository. It aligns historical evidence with evolved code, reconstructs ta...

Submitted: July 31, 2026Subjects: Machine Learning; Data Science

Description / Details

Scaling coding agents requires a continuing supply of executable data for training, benchmarking, and continuous evaluation. Each task must couple a realistic software state with a specification, development tools, and reliable verification. To expand this supply, we present Change2Task, a system grounded in repository history that converts merged pull requests into verified tasks on healthy modern revisions of the same repository. It aligns historical evidence with evolved code, reconstructs task states through Patch Reversal, Code Mapping, or Agent Reconstruction, and validates the lifecycle from a healthy base to a task state and a restored state. By deriving multiple tasks grounded in developer evidence from maintained environments, Change2Task provides executable data for coding agent training and evaluation while reducing repeated environment setup, storage, and task construction effort. We evaluate the system through five common and widely adopted coding agent task families: Bug Fix, Feature Addition, Test Generation, Application Programming Interface Migration, and Security Repair. Starting from 1,130 source changes eligible for construction, Change2Task achieves 79.6% verified task construction success across these task families. On a matched candidate set, it recovers 29.2% more verified tasks than a construction baseline based on pull requests. Historical and reconstructed cases achieve up to 98.0% matched outcome agreement under agent evaluation, while reuse of modern bases reduces measured expenditure across the complete pipeline by 10.8%.


Source: arXiv:2607.28591v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28591v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.28591v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28591v1

Please sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Access Paper
View Source PDF
Submission Info
Date:
Jul 31, 2026
Topic:
Data Science
Area:
Machine Learning
Comments:
0
Bookmark