Explorer›Data Science›Machine Learning
Research PaperResearchia:202610.22072

Velocity Ambiguity Profiles: Time-Resolved Bayes-Risk Diagnostics for Flow Matching

Yunpeng Mei

Abstract

Flow matching trains a continuum of velocity regression problems but usually reports a loss averaged over interpolation time, obscuring which regions are limited by intrinsic ambiguity and which remain data-limited. We introduce the Velocity Ambiguity Profile (VAP), $\mathcal{A}_v(t)$, the time-local Bayes-risk floor of velocity prediction, and decompose time-resolved loss as $L_N(t)=\mathcal{A}_v(t)+R(t;N)$, where only the excess term $R(t;N)$ is reducible by more data or a different estimator....

Submitted: October 22, 2026Subjects: Machine Learning; Data Science

Description / Details

Flow matching trains a continuum of velocity regression problems but usually reports a loss averaged over interpolation time, obscuring which regions are limited by intrinsic ambiguity and which remain data-limited. We introduce the Velocity Ambiguity Profile (VAP), Av(t)\mathcal{A}_v(t), the time-local Bayes-risk floor of velocity prediction, and decompose time-resolved loss as LN(t)=Av(t)+R(t;N)L_N(t)=\mathcal{A}_v(t)+R(t;N), where only the excess term R(t;N)R(t;N) is reducible by more data or a different estimator. For NN training samples and a KK-component mixture in the structured example, we prove two statistical benchmarks. In an intrinsic local-regression benchmark, Av(t)\mathcal{A}_v(t) enters the time-dependent noise factor of the standard nonparametric rate. In separated isotropic Gaussian mixtures, the Bayes velocity becomes locally affine, and a label-oracle residual-regression benchmark has parametric excess-risk scale KAv(t)/NK\mathcal{A}_v(t)/N, matched within the same separated residual Gaussian-location subproblem. Controlled Gaussian-mixture experiments validate this diagnostic through a dense transition sweep, calibrated oracle-to-blind and empirical-proxy audits, and a local controlled time-sampler stress test in which a frozen reducible-error proxy reduces reducible loss while cross-cell sensitivity delimits aggressive sampling. On CIFAR-100 DINOv2 feature flow, guided time sampling reduces uniformly evaluated velocity loss by 6.78%6.78\% and global feature Fréchet distance (FD) by 23.6%23.6\%, while class-conditional kernel inception distance (KID) shows no improvement. VAP turns an averaged flow-matching objective into a time-resolved diagnostic for locating ambiguity-limited and data-limited regions.


Source: arXiv:2610.30107v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30107v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.30107v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30107v1

Please sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Access Paper
View Source PDF
Submission Info
Date:
Oct 22, 2026
Topic:
Data Science
Area:
Machine Learning
Comments:
0
Bookmark
Velocity Ambiguity Profiles: Time-Resolved Bayes-Risk Diagnostics for Flow Matching | Researchia