ExplorerEconomicsEconomics
Research PaperResearchia:202601.20015

How Wasteful is Signaling?

Alex Frankel

Abstract

Signaling is wasteful. But how wasteful? We study the fraction of surplus dissipated in a separating equilibrium. For isoelastic environments, this waste ratio has a simple formula: $β/(β+σ)$, where $β$ is the benefit elasticity (reward to higher perception) and $σ$ is the elasticity of higher types' relative cost advantage. The ratio is constant across types and independent of other parameters, including convexity of cost in the signal. A constant waste ratio characterizes the isoelastic class....

Submitted: January 20, 2026Subjects: Economics; Economics

Description / Details

Signaling is wasteful. But how wasteful? We study the fraction of surplus dissipated in a separating equilibrium. For isoelastic environments, this waste ratio has a simple formula: β/(β+σ)β/(β+σ), where ββ is the benefit elasticity (reward to higher perception) and σσ is the elasticity of higher types' relative cost advantage. The ratio is constant across types and independent of other parameters, including convexity of cost in the signal. A constant waste ratio characterizes the isoelastic class. In winner-take-all signaling tournaments with NN candidates, exactly (N1)/N(N-1)/N of the surplus dissipates -- the same as in Tullock contests.


Source: arXiv:2601.14454v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14454v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.14454v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14454v1

Please sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Access Paper
View Source PDF
Submission Info
Date:
Jan 20, 2026
Topic:
Economics
Area:
Economics
Comments:
0
Bookmark