Contraction and Statistical Inference under Privacy for Uniformly Bounded Distributions
Abstract
We investigate $c$-interior pointwise maximal leakage (PML) as a tool for contraction analyses and disclosure control. Based on the strong adversarial threat models from maximal leakage, $c$-interior PML generalizes local differential privacy (LDP) to data-generating distributions with densities uniformly bounded away from zero by $c>0$. Viewing $c$-interior PML as an algebraic constraint on a kernel yields more flexible (and often tighter) contraction analyses than standard LDP. We provide tigh...
Description / Details
We investigate -interior pointwise maximal leakage (PML) as a tool for contraction analyses and disclosure control. Based on the strong adversarial threat models from maximal leakage, -interior PML generalizes local differential privacy (LDP) to data-generating distributions with densities uniformly bounded away from zero by . Viewing -interior PML as an algebraic constraint on a kernel yields more flexible (and often tighter) contraction analyses than standard LDP. We provide tight bounds on the Dobrushin coefficient, and bound the contraction coefficient of the Hockeystick-divergence. We further derive strong data processing inequalities on -divergences under -interior PML constraints when the input distributions to the divergence are restricted to be in the -interior. These results extend beyond the regime of pure LDP to cover a larger class of kernels, including, e.g., arbitrary stochastic matrices. We apply the results to minimax theory and provide asymptotically optimal strategies under -interior PML constraints for binary hypothesis testing and mean estimation. The results show that disclosure control with PML allows analysts to reason about systems in a more differentiated manner: For example, it allows us to quantify the privacy leakage of deterministic systems, and can give precise adversarial guarantees with respect to arbitrary distributional assumptions. Interestingly, a recurring theme in the disclosure analyses is that if the privacy problem is relatively regular (if the density bound is large), private inference can be possible without incurring any additional cost in terms of sample complexity.
Source: arXiv:2609.28297v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28297v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.28297v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28297v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Sep 24, 2026
Computer Science
Cybersecurity
0