Ancilla-Depth Phase Diagrams for Quantum Reference-Frame Comparison
Abstract
Comparing two noisy quantum reference frames as statistical experiments depends on the dimension of the ancillary memory available to the decision procedure. For finite-dimensional channels A and B with invertible A, we show that exact simulation of all measurements assisted by an r-dimensional ancilla is equivalent to r-positivity of the unique factor Gamma = BA^{-1}. The hierarchy can be realized by physical channel pairs: every unital, trace-preserving map that is k-positive but not (k+1)-pos...
Description / Details
Comparing two noisy quantum reference frames as statistical experiments depends on the dimension of the ancillary memory available to the decision procedure. For finite-dimensional channels A and B with invertible A, we show that exact simulation of all measurements assisted by an r-dimensional ancilla is equivalent to r-positivity of the unique factor Gamma = BA^{-1}. The hierarchy can be realized by physical channel pairs: every unital, trace-preserving map that is k-positive but not (k+1)-positive embeds as the factor between the channels D_a and Gamma composed with D_a on an exact interval determined by the smallest Choi eigenvalue. For depolarizing source and target channels D_a and D_b, including negative and singular source parameters, the phase boundary is for . We derive closed formulas for the restricted level-r deficiency and for the distance to every physical post-processing, , where . The largest physical conversion cost hidden from all tests through level k is . An untouched m-level spectator changes the first detecting external level from k+1 to . A transpose--depolarizing construction shows that the separation is not confined to depolarizing factors. The results quantify the distinction between ancilla-restricted statistical simulation and implementation by a single quantum channel.
Source: arXiv:2607.12947v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.12947v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.12947v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.12947v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Jul 15, 2026
Quantum Computing
Quantum Physics
0